Intrinsic Heart Rate Response as a Predictor of Rate-Adaptive Pacing Benefit
Abstract
Objective: More than half of the pacemaker systems now being implanted can be rate adaptively paced. Our objective was to determine which patients benefit from rate-adaptive pacing in terms of improvement in maximum performance and aerobic capacity.
Methods: Thirty patients with implanted accelerometer-driven, rate-adaptive pacemakers underwent a standardized, ergospirometrically and maximally symptoms=limited cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) stress test with both rate-adaptive and fixed-rate stimulation in a randomized order. The patients were divided into three groups depending on the intrinsic heart rate achieved during maximum workload: group 1 achieved ≤90 beats per minute (bpm), group 2 achieved 90 to ≤110 bpm, and group 3 achieved >110 bpm.
Results: Group 1 demonstrated a significant increase (p≤0.01) in maximum oxygen uptake from 16.4±5.6 mL/kg/min with fixed-rate pacing to 23.2±11.1 mL/kg/min (+41.5%) with rate-adaptive pacing. At the anaerobic threshold, oxygen uptake significantly increased (p≤0.01) from 11.8±2.7 mL/kg/min to 15.7±5 mL/kg/min (+33.1%). Group 2 patients showed an increase in maximum oxygen uptake from 23.3±5.4 mL/kg/min to 25.3±4.9 mL/kg/min (+8.5%., p≤0.05) as well as an increase in oxygen uptake at the anaerobic threshold from 15.9±2.6 mL/kg/min to 18.1±2.9 mL/kg/min (+13.8%, p <0.05) with rate-adaptive pacing. Group 3 demonstrated no significant difference between the two pacing methods (from 25.6±9.4 mL/kg/min to 25.9±9.3 mL/kg/min and from 15.8±5.5 mL/kg/min to 16.3±6 mL/kg/min). No difference in maximum oxygen uptake and in oxygen uptake at the anaerobic threshold was evident among the three groups when paced rate adaptively (not significant).
Conclusion: The second-generation, accelerometer controlled rate-adaptive pacemakers used in testing enabled a stress-oriented heart rate increase and an age- and gender-dependent adequate matching of maximum performance. The benefit from a rate-adaptive system to the patient increases as his or her chronotropic reserve limitation became more pronounced.
Footnotes
-
- Accepted August 2, 2007.
- Received May 6, 1994.
- 1995 by the American College of Chest Physicians












